Key Highlights:
  • Epilepsy is a condition that impairs most major brain networks, and its various symptoms can be investigated through connectomics.
  • Structural and functional connectivity changes underpin the heterogeneity of epilepsy.
  • Personalized treatment options to epilepsy can be implemented through a connectomic understanding of surgical outcomes.

Epilepsy and the recurrent seizures which define the condition is one of the most disabling and unpredictable neurological conditions an individual can face. Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is the most common form of epilepsy, afflicting over 50 million people worldwide1. Despite its prevalence,  a complete neurobiological understanding of the condition remains elusive. Generally speaking, we understand that during epilepsy, epileptogenic foci - or, specific brain regions and networks - misfire, causing seizure onset2,3

Gen epilepsy white background 2

Figure 1: Epileptogenic brain networks


Since neural connections and their communication are the underlying source of epileptic events, connectomics, a technique which evaluates how independent brain regions and networks are communicating, is uniquely positioned to assess the cause, development, and treatment response of this disorder. Indeed, emerging investigations leveraging connectomics have furthered our knowledge and understanding of epilepsy4-7.

Epilepsy and Seizures

Epilepsy is a broad class of disorders resulting in recurring seizures (abnormal electrical activity in the brain)8. There are many different causes for various forms of epilepsy, including genetics, acute illness, substance withdrawal, acute injury, and electrolyte imbalance8.

Although children and older adults are most susceptible to seizures, they can occur in people of any age group or demographic8. However, 80% of people living with epilepsy are from low and middle-income countries. With the limited accessibility to proper medical treatment that characterizes this at-risk demographic, it has been proposed that up to 70% of people with epilepsy could live seizure-free1.

Individual seizure events are complex and heterogeneous, but generally fit in one of three broad categories8:

  1. Partial seizures begin with excessive synchronized firing in one portion of the cortex7. People undergoing a partial seizure are awake and may display irregular movements, have inappropriate autonomic responses, and experience sensory hallucinations such as visual aura9.
  2. Particularly in adult individuals, these partial seizures can transition into generalized seizures and spread across the entire cortex8,9. When a seizure begins or spreads over the entire cortex, an individual loses consciousness and exhibits tonic-clonic rhythmic movements.
  3. The third class of seizures is partial-complex seizures, which cause minimal motor symptoms, but leave the individual in an altered, hallucinatory state of consciousness8.

Brain Networks and Epilepsy

Seizures largely result from an imbalance of the major inhibitory-excitatory neurotransmitter systems (GABA and Glutamate respectively) causing a cascade of neural activity and resulting in one of the three seizure types discussed above. However, the neural patterns of epileptic events are widespread, and the specific symptoms which present alongside seizures can only be fully understood by considering which brain networks are compromised10,11.

As generalized seizures engage the entire cortex, six of the seven major brain networks have been shown to play a role in their manifestation:

  • Language: The language network is responsible for processing and generating spoken and written language. TLE patients often present with language impairments and dysfunctional language network connectivity12
  • Salience: The salience network helps the brain decide what to focus on. Heightened salience network connectivity is found in TLE patients as well as childhood absence seizures13,14
  • Sensorimotor: The sensorimotor network is responsible for motor control and somatic sensations like touch. This network is engaged during some kinds of seizure activity. Moreover, it is also an epileptogenic source in some individuals15
  • Central-executive: The central-executive network is the site of higher-order decision-making and external thinking. Altered Central Executive Network connectivity in chronic epilepsy patients is believed to underpin reduced working memory performance and associated cognitive symptoms16,17
  • Limbic: The limbic network is responsible for “older” brain functions like memory, anxiety, and fight or flight responses. TLE patients often display impaired functional connectivity within the limbic network, lateralized to the hemisphere nearest to the seizure site18.
  • Default mode: The default mode network (DMN) is engaged when someone is at rest or daydreaming. Loss of consciousness in seizures may be caused by inhibition of systems that keep the DMN active whilst awake19.

Current Treatment Options for Epilepsy


A wide range of anti-epileptic medications have been developed which counter and suppress the onset of seizures in epilepsy. Broadly, these medications work by suppressing neural activity, primarily within epileptogenic foci and networks.

While these medications are effective in 60-70% of patients in abolishing recurrent seizures, they can consequently induce negative psychological and physiological side effects22,23. In the 30-40% of drug-resistant epilepsy patients in which these medications are ineffective, two alternate treatment options exist: surgical resection, and vagal nerve stimulation.



The most prominent Resection surgery for treatment-resistant epilepsy is Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT). This minimally-invasive surgery requires ablating discrete regions of epileptogenic foci, and can give patients life-changing relief from their seizures. However, successful remission of seizures is not guaranteed, and personalizing treatment strategy is quickly becoming a goal of modern neurosurgery.

Solutions such as connectomics have emerged as useful for epilepsy patient-selection and identifying those likely to respond to resective surgery, and will be discussed in the following sections24.



Alternative to neurosurgery, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) seeks to treat epilepsy symptoms by regulating neurological activity to the brain. These treatments are generally less invasive than resective and ablative surgery, reducing costs associated with treatment as well as recovery time. However, their effectiveness is highly variable between individuals, and produces a gradual response, reducing seizures to a greater extent over time from beginning treatment25,26.

Connectomics holds utility in neuromodulatory treatments of epilepsy in both identifying accurate targets for DBS27, as well as tracking the treatment response through changes in underlying brain function over time26.


Untitled design (11)

Figure 2: Common epilepsy DBS treatment sites

Tracking Epilepsy with Connectomics

With modern neuroimaging techniques such as connectomics, we can examine whole-brain connectivity in the context of epilepsy. Using this technology alongside electroencephalography (EEG) and electrophysiology (EP) makes it possible to pinpoint the brain networks and subsystems affected by or causing epilepsy-related symptoms11,28

Due to the varying nature of the disorder between individuals, personalized brain mapping may be a potential solution for identifying the worst-affected regions. For example, in a 2016 study by Donos et al., the authors paired intracranial electric stimulation with both functional and structural connectivity to investigate epilepsy-related brain changes29. Their combined map consisted of 70 regions per hemisphere outside the epileptic source, which could then be used to assess changes in neural function during epilepsy29. Such applications could help plan intractable epilepsy care. 

Connectomic analyses can also be used to identify potential mechanisms that underlie epileptic subtypes. For example, TLE patients display reduced connectivity between cortical and subcortical networks, while individuals with benign epilepsy and centrotemporal spike often display greater connectivity between cortical networks only30. With the utilization of connectomics, we may generate a better understanding of the connectivity characteristics which define epileptic subtypes, producing greater diagnostic accuracy and further treatments31-33.

The Future of Epilepsy Therapy Through Connectomics

Recent research leveraging connectomic techniques not only demonstrates its potential in identifying where epilepsy is located in the brain, but also in predicting who will respond to different types of treatments24,34,35.

Alongside seizures, epilepsy has numerous cognitive symptoms, such as impaired motor, emotional, and executive function. These symptoms are directly tied to brain networks, namely the sensorimotor, limbic, and central-executive networks. Indeed, comorbid depression afflicts between 20-55% of epilepsy patients, and has shown to be directly tied with limbic system dysfunction36

However within the context of epilepsy, brain networks and symptoms outside of seizures themselves have received relatively little attention. With advanced neuroimaging and connectomics, it may be possible to identify and better understand the brain network alterations associated with non-seizure components of epilepsy, enabling a more tailored and personalized continuum of epilepsy treatment and care35,36

Connectomics enables a detailed structural and functional view of brain changes associated with the wide variety of symptoms which afflict epilepsy patients. Already demonstrating both predictive and therapeutic value, connectomic-approaches are beginning to be used to better understand and treat the symptoms of epilepsy, and in the future may help progress personalized treatment options6, 13, 24, 27, 29, 34, 36.

Reference list

Expand to see full list of references
  1. Epilepsy. Word Health Organization. Published 2019. Updated 20 June. Accessed November 9th, 2021.
  2. Elger CE, Schmidt D. Modern management of epilepsy: A practical approach. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2008;12(4):501-539. doi:10.1016/J.YEBEH.2008.01.003
  3. Engel J, Thompson PM, Stern JM, Staba RJ, Bragin A, Mody I. Connectomics and epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26(2):186. doi:10.1097/WCO.0B013E32835EE5B8
  4. Tavakol S, Royer J, Lowe AJ, Bonilha L, Tracy JI, Jackson GD, Duncan JS, Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N, Bernhardt BC. Neuroimaging and connectomics of drug-resistant epilepsy at multiple scales: From focal lesions to macroscale networks. Epilepsia. 2019;60(4):593-604. doi:10.1111/EPI.14688
  5. Vetkas A, Germann J, Elias G, Loh A, Boutet A, Yamamoto K, Sarica C, Samuel N, Milano V, Fomenko A, Santyr B, Tasserie J, Gwun D, Jung HH, Valiante T, Ibrahim GM, Wennberg R, Kalia SK, Lozano AM. Identifying the neural network for neuromodulation in epilepsy through connectomics and graphs. Brain Communications. 2022;4(3). doi:10.1093/BRAINCOMMS/FCAC092
  6. Gleichgerrcht E, Kocher M, Bonilha L. Connectomics and graph theory analyses: Novel insights into network abnormalities in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2015;56(11):1660-1668. doi:10.1111/EPI.13133
  7. Richardson MP. Large scale brain models of epilepsy: dynamics meets connectomics. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2012;83(12):1238-1248. doi:10.1136/JNNP-2011-301944
  8. Huff JS, Murr N. Seizure. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)2021.
  9. Kumar A, Maini K, Arya K, Sharma S. Simple Partial Seizure. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL)2021.
  10. Stefan H, Lopes da Silva FH. Epileptic neuronal networks: methods of identification and clinical relevance. Front Neurol. 2013;4:8.
  11. Engel J, Thompson PM, Stern JM, Staba RJ, Bragin A, Mody I. Connectomics and epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26(2):186-194.
  12. Trimmel K, Vos SB, Caciagli L, et al. Decoupling of functional and structural language networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2021.
  13. Zhou X, Zhang Z, Yu L, et al. Disturbance of functional and effective connectivity of the salience network involved in attention deficits in right temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2021;124:108308.
  14. Luo C, Yang T, Tu S, et al. Altered intrinsic functional connectivity of the salience network in childhood absence epilepsy. J Neurol Sci. 2014;339(1-2):189-195.
  15. Laich E, Kuzniecky R, Mountz J, et al. Supplementary sensorimotor area epilepsy. Seizure localization, cortical propagation and subcortical activation pathways using ictal SPECT. Brain. 1997;120 ( Pt 5):855-864.
  16. Ren Y, Pan L, Du X, Hou Y, Li X, Song Y. Functional brain network mechanism of executive control dysfunction in temporal lobe epilepsy. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):137.
  17. Vlooswijk MCG, Jansen JFA, Jeukens CRLPN, Marian Majoie HJ, Hofman PAM, de Krom MCTFM, Aldenkamp AP, Backes WH. Memory processes and prefrontal network dysfunction in cryptogenic epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011;52(8):1467-1475. doi:10.1111/J.1528-1167.2011.03108.X
  18. Jo HJ, Kenney-Jung DL, Balzekas I, et al. Relationship Between Seizure Frequency and Functional Abnormalities in Limbic Network of Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Front Neurol. 2019;10:488.
  19. Danielson NB, Guo JN, Blumenfeld H. The default mode network and altered consciousness in epilepsy. Behav Neurol. 2011;24(1):55-65.
  20. Zhang Q, Yang F, Hu Z, Zhang Z, Xu Q, Dante M, Wu H, Li Z, Li Q, Li K, Lu G. Resting-state fMRI revealed different brain activities responding to valproic acid and levetiracetam in benign epilepsy with central-temporal spikes. European Radiology. 2017;27(5):2137-2145. doi:10.1007/S00330-016-4531-Z/TABLES/3
  21. Qiao PF, Niu GM. Resting-State fMRI findings in patients with first-Episode idiopathic epilepsy before and after treatment. Neurosciences Journal. 2017;22(4):316-319. doi:10.17712/NSJ.2017.4.20160650
  22. How Seizure Medicines Work | Epilepsy Foundation. Accessed June 15, 2022.
  1. Side Effects of Anti-seizure Medication - Epilepsy Action Australia. Accessed June 15, 2022.
  2. Liao W, Ji GJ, Xu Q, et al. Functional Connectome before and following Temporal Lobectomy in Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23153.
  3. Zamponi N, Passamonti C, Cesaroni E, Trignani R, Rychlicki F. Effectiveness of vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with drop-attacks and different epileptic syndromes. Seizure. 2011;20(6):468-474. doi:10.1016/J.SEIZURE.2011.02.011
  4. Zangiabadi N, Ladino LDi, Sina F, Orozco-Hernández JP, Carter A, Téllez-Zenteno JF. Deep Brain Stimulation and Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in Neurology. 2019;10(JUN):601. doi:10.3389/FNEUR.2019.00601
  5. Vetkas A, Germann J, Elias G, et al. Identifying the neural network for neuromodulation in epilepsy through connectomics and graphs. Brain Communications. 2022;4(3). doi:10.1093/BRAINCOMMS/FCAC092
  6. Centeno M, Carmichael DW. Network Connectivity in Epilepsy: Resting State fMRI and EEG-fMRI Contributions. Front Neurol. 2014;5:93.
  7. Donos C, Maliia MD, Mindruta I, et al. A connectomics approach combining structural and effective connectivity assessed by intracranial electrical stimulation. Neuroimage. 2016;132:344-358.
  8. Fu C, Aisikaer A, Chen Z, Yu Q, Yin J, Yang W. Different Functional Network Connectivity Patterns in Epilepsy: A Rest-State fMRI Study on Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Benign Epilepsy With Centrotemporal Spike. Front Neurol. 2021;12:668856.
  9. Balachandra, A. R., Kaestner, E., Bahrami, N., Reyes, A., Lalani, S., Macari, A. C., Paul, B. M., Bonilha, L., & McDonald, C. R. (2020). Clinical utility of structural connectomics in predicting memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology94(23), e2424–e2435.
  10. Johnson, G. W., Doss, D. J., & Englot, D. J. (2022). Network dysfunction in pre and postsurgical epilepsy: Connectomics as a tool and not a destination. Current Opinion in Neurology35(2), 196–201.
  11. Middlebrooks, E. H., He, X., Grewal, S. S., & Keller, S. S. (2022). Neuroimaging and thalamic connectomics in epilepsy neuromodulation. Epilepsy Research182, 106916.
  12. Mithani K, Mikhail M, Morgan BR, et al. Connectomic Profiling Identifies Responders to Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2019;86(5):743-753.
  13. Jensen FE. Epilepsy as a spectrum disorder: Implications from novel clinical and basic neuroscience. Epilepsia. 2011;52 Suppl 1:1-6.
  14. Tracy JI, Doucet GE. Resting-state functional connectivity in epilepsy: Growing relevance for clinical decision making. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2015;28(2):158-165. doi:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000178